Relationships between Borda voting and Zermelo ranking
نویسندگان
چکیده
There are many situations wherein a group of individuals (e.g., voters, experts, sports writers) must produce an ordered list of 'best' alternatives selected from a given group of alternatives (e.g., candidates, proposals, sports teams). Two long established mechanisms that have been used for this task are 'Zermelo's Ranking Method' (1929) and 'Borda's Voting Scheme' (1781). The main purpose of this paper is to point out that they are, under certain common circumstances, identical. We then show that Zermelo's Method can be used in situations that Borda's Method is not designed to handle.
منابع مشابه
UPV-WSD : Combining different WSD Methods by means of Fuzzy Borda Voting
This paper describes the WSD system developed for our participation to the SemEval-1. It combines various methods by means of a fuzzy Borda voting. The fuzzy Borda votecounting scheme is one of the best known methods in the field of collective decision making. In our system the different disambiguation methods are considered as experts that give a preference ranking for the senses a word can be...
متن کاملOn the Gap between Outcomes of Voting Rules
Various voting rules (or social choice procedures) have been proposed to select a winner from the preferences of an entire population: Plurality, veto, Borda, Minimax, Copeland, etc. Although in theory, these rules may yield drastically different outcomes, for real-world datasets, behavioral social choice analyses have found that the rules are often in perfect agreement with each other! This wo...
متن کاملTextMESS at GeoCLEF 2008: Result Merging with Fuzzy Borda Ranking
This paper describe the joint participation by the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and the Universidad of Jaén to the GeoCLEF task. This activity has been carried out within the framework of the Spanish TextMESS project (Intelligent, Interactive and Multilingual Text Mining based on Human Language Technologies). The method employed for the participation is a result merging algorithm based o...
متن کاملVoting and different ranking orders in DEA
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique now widely use for efficiency evaluation of a set of Decision Making Units (DMUs). As regards of the necessity for ranking efficient units different DEA models presented each of which has advantages and rank efficient units from special aspects. Note that all the existing ranking models have disadvantages, as well and there is not a model in which all t...
متن کاملStandard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs.
This paper compares the relative performance of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) based on quality weights elicited by rating scale (RS), time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG). The standard against which relative performance is assessed is individual preference elicited by direct ranking. The correlation between predicted and direct ranking is significantly higher for TTO-QALYs than f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social choice and welfare
دوره 32 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009